So it’s observers now? Not experts? Or experts too short a word to go into headline?
So damn odd to see this when they BURIED the 3,000 figure yesterday and tucked it in a small story at the bottom of the page.
And I don’t know what is old or new in this story. Got MTF and past statements by people…what’s the thrust? I don’t think the headline writer got it either.
Maybe should angle on how we should look at reproduction rates, rather than absolute numbers – whether they are doubling or tripling or slowing down. Right now it’s a mish mash of an attempt to tell people not to worry about a number that it didn’t even highlight in the first place. Looks like got no editing input at all here.