If you haven’t got a copy of today’s TNP, go buy quickly before it runs out. It’s the first time in a long time I’ve seen a sexy barely-there news picture on the front cover that isn’t posed. I’m not showing it here because I’m hoping you go raise TNP’s circulation…
But that poor woman and her wardrobe malfunction a la Janet Jackson! In front of a crowd somemore. The TNP photographer must have had his lens trained on her for some time, to get a sequence of pictures of the trouble she was in before her top slipped off! . The poor woman must be really devastated to have herself captured on film. I wonder at the fellows at MCS who dressed her though. That top should have been better secured, taped to the skin or something…
I’m glad she wasn’t named and that her face was pixellated. It’s the right thing to do. But I’m wondering at the un-named people in this story about investors crying foul over $10million start-uphttp://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_804000.html
Nobody was named, not a single investor “because they were embarassed”, not the Singapore stockbroker who brokered the deal or the Hong kong guy behind it. Not even the company. Yet police reports were made. A picture had the name of the company blanked out…I guess ST was trying to protect itself? If it’s not a scam then it risks being sued? But isn’t it enough to confirm that Commercial Affairs Department is investigating this XX company on allegations of some kind of fraud. I mean, that’s the truth isn’t it? As for those investors, which included a former MP, put your name to your case….or it just seems you are using the media to “lobby” your cause.
An ex-journalist who can't get enough of the news after being in the business for 26 years
